Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 009
Original file (2013 009.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-009

CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, M1000.4, 1.B.12.A, JFW, Failed Medical Physcial Procurement
Standards, RE3G

RELIEF REQUESTED | RE 1 code; Change Narrative Reason to Reduction In Strength

BY DRB
CORRECTIONS

TIS 0 yrs, O months, 25 days
Policy Implications None

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards after 25 days at recruit
training on the Spring of 2012. The applicant was issued an Honorable discharge and an RE-3G reenlistment

code. For entry-level separations under 180 days, the character of service normally deemed and issued as
‘Uncharacterized’.

The Board members thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s record of service. The separation package and all
related documents on the applicant’s back problems were available. The applicant had an existing back problem
from their prior service time in one of the other Armed Forces. This was disclosed by the applicant while at
Military Entrance Processing Station. The applicant verbally expressed the existing condition to the recruit
training physician within the first 2 or 3 days of training. The applicant’s pain resulted in a light duty status and
unable to meet the physical fitness standards expected by all recruits. The applicant has provided a single letter
(post service to the present) from a private sector physician. The letter does not recommend the applicant for

future military service or render the applicant’s physical fitness capabilities to be fully equipped for a training
regimen.

Given the applicant’s failed medical/physical standards, the RE-3G appropriately documents that the enlistment
was terminated early as a result of a disqualifying condition, but does not serve as a permanent bar for
enlistment. Based upon the gaining Service’s accession policies in effect the applicant may request a waiver of

the disqualifying condition. The applicant has not substantiated any error or inequity with his assigned RE
code.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board recommends no relief.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-143

    Original file (2005-143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On February 28, 1996, the applicant was discharged from the Coast Guard pursuant to Article 12.B.18.2 of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual. CGPC stated that the applicant’s discharge for physical standards as determined by the DRB is consistent with Coast Guard policy and that RE-4 is the appropriate reenlistment code given the applicant’s character of service. In light of the fact that the applicant’s record is devoid of anything derogatory and that the DRB changed the narrative reason for...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2010-198

    Original file (2010-198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The applicant alleged that the Coast Guard’s decision to discharge him was erro- neous because his tumor was benign and did not interfere with his function, prevent him from wearing the uniform or protective gear, require frequent specialized attention, or have a high malignant potential, as required by Chapter 3.D.32.a. The Board finds that...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2007-005

    Original file (2007-005.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    following codes, narrative reasons, and reenlistment codes: SPD Code The Separation Program Designator Handbook in effect in 2001 authorized the use of the Narrative Reason RE Code Authority RE-3L 12-B-20 Entry Level Performance and Conduct JGA (as on applicant’s DD 214) JFW Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards Condition, Not a Disability RE-3G RE-3X RE-4 RE-3G RE-3X RE-4 12-B-12 12-B-12 Disability, Existed Prior to Service, Medical Board Erroneous Entry...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 003

    Original file (2014 003.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-003 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, None Stated, JDA, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Change Narrative Reason (NR) for Separation BY DRB Reasons CORRECTIONS TIS Policy Implications O yrs, 5 months, 16 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service in 2012 due to physical ailments that limited the ability to perform the basic shipboard tasks. Based on the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-148

    Original file (2004-148.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On March 25, 1991, the applicant was discharged from the Coast Guard pursuant to Article 12.B.12 of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual. The JAG stated that the applicant was separated for a physical disability and a RE-3G reenlistment code was entirely appropriate. Although the JAG and CGPC did not recommend that the requested relief be granted, neither objected to correcting the applicant’s record if the following corrections were requested by the applicant: a. b. c. Separation...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2010-216

    Original file (2010-216.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Discharge from the Coast Guard On April 3, 2006, the commanding officer (CO) of the Coast Guard Training Center, Cape May informed the applicant that action had been initiated to discharge him from the Coast Guard with an honorable discharge due to unsuitability because he had refused to train. A majority of the DRB (4 of 5) voted to change the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge from unsuitability to “physical standards,” his separation code from JNC (unacceptable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010136

    Original file (20100010136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2008, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD Proceedings in Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the proceedings because his condition was not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701315

    Original file (199701315.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    951024: Applicant was discharged.2. POSSIBLE BOARD ISSUES : There are no additional issues presented to the Board. The Army Discharge Review Board cannot change your reenlistment code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018312

    Original file (20140018312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * SF 93 (Report of Medical History) * SF 513 (Medical Record – Consultation Sheet) * Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Information memorandum * Medical 200 Board summary * DA Form 4707 (EPSBD Proceedings) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation stated in: a. Paragraph 5-11 - Soldiers who were not medically...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 014

    Original file (2014 014.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-014 RE-3G, Adjustment Disorder, SPD code and Sep Auth amended. None 0 yrs, 11 months, 23 days | Policy Implications | None Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Personality Disorder in September 2000. In accordance with (post-policy) ALCOAST 252/09, the Board endorses a change to SPD code JFY, Narrative Reason of Adjustment Disorder, and a Re-entry code of RE-3G.